Micropropagation of Rubus chrysophyllus Reinw. ex Miq. and Rubus fraxinifolius Poir.

Authors

  • Lily Ismaini Cibodas Botanical Garden- Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  • Destri Destri Cibodas Botanical Garden- Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  • Muhammad Imam Surya Cibodas Botanical Garden- Indonesian Institute of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/jtls.07.01.12

Keywords:

Rubus chrysophyllus, Rubus fraxinifolius, micropropagation, indole-3-butyric acid (IBA)

Abstract

Rubus chrysophyllus and Rubus fraxinifolius are a native species in Indonesia, which has highly potential to be developed as fruits crops. Propagation is an important factor in developing a fruit cultivation. In vitro micropropagation is an important instrument to improve the quality of seedling. Our experiment was aimed to study the micropropagation of R. chrysophyllus and R. fraxinifolius. The shoot tips were cultured on MS medium supplemented with 10 mg/L indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) for enhancing roots of R. chrysophyllus and R. fraxinifolius in the in vitro condition. Then, the rooted plantlets were transplanted into cocopeat media for acclimatization. The results showed that R. chrysophyllus and R. fraxinifolius gave a different response on the medium contain 10 mg/L of IBA. The R. fraxinifolius shows the best results compared to R. chrysophyllus on 14 days after subculture. The roots length and roots numbers of R. fraxinifolius and R. chrysophyllus were 9.13 cm and 11.25; 2.20 cm and 2.00, respectively. Although R. fraxinifolius was growing better than R. chrysophyllus, but after acclimatization R. chrysophyllus were able to grow faster than R. fraxinifolius. Moreover, on the parameters of plant height shows that R. chrysophyllus (9.20 cm) were growth higher than R. fraxinifolius (4.05 cm) during acclimatization.

References

van Steenis CGGJ (1972) The Mountain Flora of Java. E. J. Brill, Leiden.

Kalkman C (1993) Rosaceae. Leiden University. Flora Malesiana ser. I. Vol. 11 (2): 227-351.

Reed BM (1990) Multiplication of Rubus germplasm in vitro: A screen of 256 accessions. Fruit Varieties Journal 44 (3): 141-148.

Palonen P, Buszard D (1998) In vitro screening for cold hardiness of raspberry cultivars. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 53 (3): 213-216.

Martinussen I, Nilsen G, Svenson L et al. (2004) In vitro propagation of cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 78 (1): 43-49.

Fira A, Clapa D, Plopa C. (2009) Micropropagation of blackberry thornless cultivars. Scientific Papers of the R.I.F.G. Pitesti 25: 213-221.

Dziedzic E, Jagła J (2013) Micropropagation of Rubus and Ribes spp. In: Lambardi M, Ozudogru EA, Jain SM (eds) Protocols for micropropagation of selected economically-important horticultural plants. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 149–160.

Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-497.

Najaf-Abadi AJ, Hamidoghli Y (2009) Micropropagation of thornless trailing blackberry (Rubus sp.) by axillary bud explants. Australian Journal of Crop Science 3 (4): 191-194.

Meng R, Chen THH, Finn CE, Li Y (2004) Improving in vitro plant regeneration from leaf and petiole explants of ‘Marion’ Blackberry. Horticultural Science 39 (2): 316-320.

Mokhtarzadeh S, Hajyzadeh M, Ahmad HA, Khawar KM (2013) The problems in acclimatization of in vitro multiplied plants of Lavandula angustifolia Miller under field conditions. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 988 71-76. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.988.6.

Kozai T (1991) Micropropagation under photoautotrophic conditions. In: Micropropagation. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 447–469.

Pospisilova J, Catsky J, Sestak Z (1997) Photosynthesis in plants cultivated in vitro. In: Pessarakli, M. (ed.): Handbook of Photosynthesis. CRC Press, New York, pp 525–540.

KadleÄek P, Tichá I, Haisel D et al. (2001) Importance of in vitro pretreatment for ex vitro acclimatization and growth. Plant Science 161 (4): 695-701.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-31

Issue

Section

Articles